Author:
Jean Bertrand de Lartigue -
Chairman of HR specialist HR2all LTD
The business
environment has changed radically in the last decade. The
next ten years could see even more radical changes. If companies' don't
want to find themselves outpaced, outthought and outsold, they need to
restructure now, argues management change consultant Jean-Bertrand de
Lartigue.
Everyone talks about “blue
chip” businesses as the companies they want to invest in, or work for.
Why not? These, after all, are the businesses at the top of their
individual ladders - profitable, successful, and solid.
But if that's the case, why
have so many businesses we would have called “blue chip” ten years ago
now sliding down the asset league, their share prices in the doldrums,
their board rooms under siege to make radical changes to the way they
run their business . . . their MDs, chairmen and financial directors
looking for new jobs?
Of course, there are lots
of reasons why former flagship businesses such as Marks &
Spencer, Sainsbury's, are now seeing the shine come off their shares,
and why other names that starred in the 1990s have either been taken
over by stronger rivals or are no longer in the top 250.
And these are just the
companies that make the headlines . Every year in Britain thousands of
once successful businesses bite the dust - SMEs that were once highly
profitable, but which have now lost their way.
How did this happen? And
what messages does this send to today's businesses?
Well the biggest single
reason why successful businesses stop being successful is that they
stop being competitive, allowing other companies to steal a march . . .
and their market share.
And the biggest single
cause of THAT is lack of forward planning: recognising that change is
on the way and anticipating it ahead of your rivals - either by moving
into new product or service areas, or restructuring your business to
deal with the new opportunities and the new challenges on the horizon.
I will leave the issue of
anticipating technology and market trends to the engineers and
marketers. What I can talk about is gearing up your workforce to deal
with change.
But how, comes the
anguished cry from MDs everywhere, can I possibly structure my company
to deal with new trends and new products or services if I donąt know
what will be wanted from my company two, three or five years down the
line?
The answer is simple. Make
the company structure fluid - and so able to deal with or anticipate
change quickly and relatively painlessly.
By that I mean that the old
hierarchical structure and chain of command goes out, as do the old
fashioned job titles; and that people are not taken on to do a specific
“job” for a company (which may not even be needed 12 months down the
line), but taken on for their skills and attitude, and their aptitude
to learn new skills.
Apart from having a
workforce able to deal with fast changing circumstances, you will also
have one that will not need to be made redundant when the first big
contract is lost - with all the expense and grief that can cause - or
shoehorned into new roles that they will not be able to deal with.
Working in a fluid company
is a bit like playing rugby as it is now played by the top teams. Gone
are the days when the forwards were there simply to push and shove and
win the ball, while the backs got cold waiting for their chance to run
with the ball. Now, every player has to be able to run, defend, work in
a maul . . . and score. 15-man rugby . . . in football . . . the
message is the same. Versatility and flexibility allow a team to mould
their style of play to different opponents, and the same qualities help
businesses face fresh challenges.
So the company that has a
workforce ready to deal with a whole range of situations is far better
equipped to cope when new market opportunities open up . . . or when
they have to turn their hand to new services or products when overseas
sourcing, new technologies or shifts in customer demands call for a
change in direction .
All that's fine in theory,
but how do you make your workforce more fluid and flexible? You do it
by making these qualities central to the whole company culture.
Departmental structures need to reflect the fact that most work done
these days is (E-project-based)- here today, moved on tomorrow, but
each project requiring a specific skills set to make it happen.
When a project is planned,
pick a team of people who have the core skills to make it happen.
Ideally, you would add to this team people who can attach themselves
and apply what I would call ‘secondary skills'. So a marketing person
who wants to learn more about finance would spend part of their working
day shadowing the finance person in the project team - contributing to
the project, but even more importantly adding to their skills set. It
won't put the project at risk through their inexperience but it will
ultimately lead to a stronger and more flexible workforce.
The end point of this way
of working is “continuous improvement”: a philosophy that says that the
company will help every person who comes to work for them to constantly
refine and build on their skills. It recognises that people are every
company's biggest asset - and invests in their improvement.
It makes a lot of sense
when you consider that people are the only asset within a business that
will appreciate in value - not depreciate - over time.